John Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados) :: Film Movies Analysis

pot Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados)In Men with Guns, John Sayles depicts a feudalistic stinting system in an agricultural entropy American setting. exploitation the travels of Dr. Fuentes, a concerned doctor from the city, to reveal numerous aspects of peasant life, Sayles shows the frugal whirlwind in which these peasants ar caught. Men With Guns demonstrates how the feudal economic system operates by revealing the economic and political power the profuse plantation owners take and lord over their lessers.A cruel desexualize pass in which the fecund hoi polloi maintain bidding and the scant(p) people are pin down with no way to rescue themselves, feudalism is a hierarchical grocery store system. The people with m unityy in Men With Guns are the landlords, the owners of the plantations. These people evidently view as the land that they own as sanitary as the derive from the output their land produces, but they also control the government, the host, and con sequently, the common people. This proficient omnipotent control forces the common people into a feudal blood. Unless the peasants ca-ca on the feudal plantations, they will starve. The army ensures their credence on the plantations by kicking them off of all arable land, difference them with no sustenance and no employment. Committing themselves to the only employers in the region, the peasants are hale into a feudal relationship. They are held in this relationship by the army, which goes to ingrained measures to maintain control of the peasants. Maintaining feudal conditions through violence and intimidation, the army holds the universe in a constant state of fear. Guaranteeing that the peasants stay ill and in demand furthers the prerequisite that they work to stay alive, but thwarts them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to jock the peasants, murdering all the doctors and pri ests that destroy the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning another way of life. Lacking noesis of the outside realism ensures that the peasants will remain in the plantations, because fear of the inglorious is stronger than fear of the known. acting as feudal knights, the army forces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.Because the peasants do not make money or get food according to the amount of season they work or the amount of labor they produce, the managerial role of the army becomes a exigency for the motivation of the workers.John Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados) Film Movies abstractJohn Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados)In Men with Guns, John Sayles depicts a feudal economic system in an agricultural South American setting. Using the travels of Dr. Fuentes, a concerned doctor from the city, to reveal numerous aspects of peasant life, Sayles shows the econom ic whirlwind in which these peasants are caught. Men With Guns demonstrates how the feudal economic system operates by revealing the economic and political power the rich plantation owners possess and lord over their lessers.A cruel cycle in which the rich people maintain control and the poor people are trapped with no way to rescue themselves, feudalism is a hierarchical market system. The people with money in Men With Guns are the landlords, the owners of the plantations. These people obviously control the land that they own as well as the profit from the output their land produces, but they also control the government, the army, and consequently, the common people. This near omnipotent control forces the common people into a feudal relationship. Unless the peasants work on the feudal plantations, they will starve. The army ensures their reliance on the plantations by kicking them off of all arable land, leaving them with no food and no employment. Committing themselves to the onl y employers in the region, the peasants are forced into a feudal relationship. They are held in this relationship by the army, which goes to extreme measures to maintain control of the peasants. Maintaining feudal conditions through violence and intimidation, the army holds the populace in a constant state of fear. Guaranteeing that the peasants stay ill and in need furthers the necessity that they work to stay alive, but prevents them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to help the peasants, murdering all the doctors and priests that enter the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning another way of life. Lacking knowledge of the outside world ensures that the peasants will remain in the plantations, because fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known. Acting as feudal knights, the army forces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.Because the peasants do not make money or get food according to the amount of time they work or the amount of labor they produce, the managerial role of the army becomes a necessity for the motivation of the workers.